Parsing in a Broad Sense
نویسندگان
چکیده
Having multiple representations of the same instance is common in software language engineering: models can be visualised as graphs, edited as text, serialised as XML. When mappings between such representations are considered, terms “parsing” and “unparsing” are often used with incompatible meanings and varying sets of underlying assumptions. We investigate 12 classes of artefacts found in software language processing, present a case study demonstrating their implementations and state-of-the-art mappings among them, and systematically explore the technical research space of bidirectional mappings to build on top of the existing body of work and discover as of yet unused relationships.
منابع مشابه
Getting Serious About Word Sense Disambiguation
Recent advances in large-scale, broad coverage part-of-speech tagging and syntactic parsing have been achieved in no small part due to the availability of large amounts of online, human-annotated corpora. In this paper, I argue that a large, human sensetagged corpus is also critical as well as necessary to achieve broad coverage, high accuracy word sense disambiguation, where the sense distinct...
متن کاملبررسی مقایسهای تأثیر برچسبزنی مقولات دستوری بر تجزیه در پردازش خودکار زبان فارسی
In this paper, the role of Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging for parsing in automatic processing of the Persian language is studied. To this end, the impact of the quality of POS tagging as well as the impact of the quantity of information available in the POS tags on parsing are studied. To reach the goals, three parsing scenarios are proposed and compared. In the first scenario, the parser assigns...
متن کاملAn improved joint model: POS tagging and dependency parsing
Dependency parsing is a way of syntactic parsing and a natural language that automatically analyzes the dependency structure of sentences, and the input for each sentence creates a dependency graph. Part-Of-Speech (POS) tagging is a prerequisite for dependency parsing. Generally, dependency parsers do the POS tagging task along with dependency parsing in a pipeline mode. Unfortunately, in pipel...
متن کاملSession 5: Natural Language, Discourse
The papers in this group cover a broad range of topics from different perspectives. They have in common an emphasis on the handling of frequently-occurring phenomena in real data sets of spoken and written language, phenomena which are in some sense outside of the scope of some of the core problems in human language technologies. We can view problems such as acoustic processing, word recognitio...
متن کاملError Parsing: An alternative method of implementing social judgment theory
We present a novel method of judgment analysis called Error Parsing, based upon an alternative method of implementing Social Judgment Theory (SJT). SJT and Error Parsing both posit the same three components of error in human judgment: error due to noise, error due to cue weighting, and error due to inconsistency. In that sense, the broad theory and framework are the same. However, SJT and Error...
متن کاملStacking or Supertagging for Dependency Parsing - What's the Difference?
Supertagging was recently proposed to provide syntactic features for statistical dependency parsing, contrary to its traditional use as a disambiguation step. We conduct a broad range of controlled experiments to compare this specific application of supertagging with another method for providing syntactic features, namely stacking. We find that in this context supertagging is a form of stacking...
متن کامل